The armour of the IS-2 (1944) (China) is fitting for a heavy tank, with enough thickness to ward off most incoming shots. However, there are lots of weak points present that enemy guns can readily penetrate, namely the lower glacis and the turret front, the latter which presents only 100 mm of armour if the incoming shell hits at a 0 degree impact angle.
Neither the T-34 nor the M4 was a match for Germany's heavier tanks, the Panther (technically a medium tank) or the Tiger I; the Soviets used the IS-2 heavy tank and the U.S. used the M26 Pershing as the heavy tanks of their forces instead.
The Tiger I was a tank made by Nazi Germany. It was first made in 1942 by the Henschel und Sohn company. The tank was used during World War II in the North African Campaign and Operation Barbarossa. The Tiger I used a 8.8 cm KwK 36 gun. It had 100 mm (3.9 in) of armor. The Tiger I has been called an outstanding design for its time. [12]
The M1 Abrams, is a little heavier than the Leopard, coming in at 62.6 tons. Even with a modern engine, the tank only has a maximum speed of 30mph. The Abrams has 700mm thick armor, but though it
Michael Wittmann. Michael Wittmann (22 April 1914 – 8 August 1944) was a German Waffen-SS tank commander during the Second World War. He is known for his ambush of elements of the British 7th Armored Division during the Battle of Villers-Bocage on 13 June 1944. While in command of a Tiger I tank, Wittmann was claimed to have destroyed up to
Well, both of these tanks also cut through the Tiger while having better mobility and a stabilizer on the Centurion. They are also much more versatile and resistant to uptiers. You can still be competetive with the Cent Mk10 and M46 in a full up-tier while the Tiger II 105 is outclassed even in a slightest up-tier, having to flank medium tanks
XGCaU. 42 106 424 478 261 191 53 463 390
is 2 tank vs tiger
